Necrosis or Flap Loss After Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Reconstruction: Impact of Perforators and Recipient Vessels

Abstract Background  The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of the number and location of perforators harvested and the recipient vessels used on deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap survival and the occurrence of flap necrosis requiring re-operation. Patients and Methods  Four hu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of reconstructive microsurgery OPEN 2021-01, Vol.6 (1), p.e20-e27
Hauptverfasser: Palve, Johanna S., Luukkaala, Tiina H., Kääriäinen, Minna T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background  The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of the number and location of perforators harvested and the recipient vessels used on deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap survival and the occurrence of flap necrosis requiring re-operation. Patients and Methods  Four hundred and seventy-one DIEP flap reconstructions, performed between January 2008 and December 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. Results  Flap necrosis requiring re-operation was observed in 40 (9%) of flaps and total flap loss rate was 1% ( n  = 6). No significant differences were observed between internal mammary vessels (IMV, n  = 287, 61%) and thoracodorsal vessels (TDV, n  = 184, 39%) regarding postoperative re-anastomosis ( p  = 0.529) or flap survival ( p  = 0.646). Intraoperative conversion from IMV to TDV was performed on 64 (14%) patients. TDV were more commonly associated with problems in preparation of the vessels than IMV ( p  
ISSN:2377-0813
2377-0821
DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1729638