Necrosis or Flap Loss After Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Reconstruction: Impact of Perforators and Recipient Vessels
Abstract Background The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of the number and location of perforators harvested and the recipient vessels used on deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap survival and the occurrence of flap necrosis requiring re-operation. Patients and Methods Four hu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of reconstructive microsurgery OPEN 2021-01, Vol.6 (1), p.e20-e27 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background
The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of the number and location of perforators harvested and the recipient vessels used on deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap survival and the occurrence of flap necrosis requiring re-operation.
Patients and Methods
Four hundred and seventy-one DIEP flap reconstructions, performed between January 2008 and December 2019, were retrospectively analyzed.
Results
Flap necrosis requiring re-operation was observed in 40 (9%) of flaps and total flap loss rate was 1% (
n
= 6). No significant differences were observed between internal mammary vessels (IMV,
n
= 287, 61%) and thoracodorsal vessels (TDV,
n
= 184, 39%) regarding postoperative re-anastomosis (
p
= 0.529) or flap survival (
p
= 0.646). Intraoperative conversion from IMV to TDV was performed on 64 (14%) patients. TDV were more commonly associated with problems in preparation of the vessels than IMV (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2377-0813 2377-0821 |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-0041-1729638 |