A randomized prospective cross over study on the effects of medium cut-off membranes on T cellular and serologic immune phenotypes in hemodialysis

Extended cut-off filtration by medium cut-off membranes (MCO) has been shown to be safe in maintenance hemodialysis (HD). The notion of using them for the control of chronic low-grade inflammation and positively influencing cellular immune aberrations seems tempting. We conducted an open label, mult...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2022-09, Vol.12 (1), p.16419-16419, Article 16419
Hauptverfasser: Lorenz, Georg, Shen, Yuli, Hausinger, Renate Ilona, Scheid, Caroline, Eckermann, Marie, Hornung, Sophia, Cardoso, Joana, Lech, Maciej, Ribeiro, Andrea, Haller, Bernhard, Holzmann-Littig, Christopher, Steubl, Dominik, Braunisch, Matthias C., Günthner, Roman, Poschenrieder, Andreas, Freitag, Britt, Weber, Mario, Luppa, Peter, Heemann, Uwe, Schmaderer, Christoph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Extended cut-off filtration by medium cut-off membranes (MCO) has been shown to be safe in maintenance hemodialysis (HD). The notion of using them for the control of chronic low-grade inflammation and positively influencing cellular immune aberrations seems tempting. We conducted an open label, multicenter, randomized, 90 day 2-phase cross over clinical trial (MCO- vs. high flux-HD). 46 patients underwent randomization of which 34 completed the study. Dialysate- or pre- and post-dialysis serum inflammatory mediators were assayed for each study visit. Ex vivo T cell activation was assessed from cryopreserved leucocytes by flow cytometry. Linear mixed models were used to compare treatment modalities, with difference in pre-dialysis serum MCP-1 levels after 3 months as the predefined primary endpoint. Filtration/dialysate concentrations of most mediators, including MCP-1 (mean ± SD: 10.5 ± 5.9 vs. 5.1 ± 3.8 pg/ml, P  
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-20818-z