Investigating the Atmospheric Mass Loss of the Kepler-105 Planets Straddling the Radius Gap

An intriguing pattern among exoplanets is the lack of detected planets between approximately 1.5 R ⊕ and 2.0 R ⊕ . One proposed explanation for this “radius gap” is the photoevaporation of planetary atmospheres, a theory that can be tested by studying individual planetary systems. Kepler-105 is an i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astronomical journal 2024-02, Vol.167 (2), p.84
Hauptverfasser: Householder, Aaron, Weiss, Lauren M., Owen, James E., Isaacson, Howard, Howard, Andrew W., Fabrycky, Daniel, Rogers, Leslie A., Schlichting, Hilke E., Fulton, Benjamin J., Petigura, Erik A., Giacalone, Steven, Murphy, Joseph M. Akana, Beard, Corey, Chontos, Ashley, Dai, Fei, Van Zandt, Judah, Lubin, Jack, Rice, Malena, Polanski, Alex S., Dalba, Paul, Blunt, Sarah, Turtelboom, Emma V., Rubenzahl, Ryan, Brinkman, Casey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:An intriguing pattern among exoplanets is the lack of detected planets between approximately 1.5 R ⊕ and 2.0 R ⊕ . One proposed explanation for this “radius gap” is the photoevaporation of planetary atmospheres, a theory that can be tested by studying individual planetary systems. Kepler-105 is an ideal system for such testing due to the ordering and sizes of its planets. Kepler-105 is a Sun-like star that hosts two planets straddling the radius gap in a rare architecture with the larger planet closer to the host star ( R b = 2.53 ± 0.07 R ⊕ , P b = 5.41 days, R c = 1.44 ± 0.04 R ⊕ , P c = 7.13 days). If photoevaporation sculpted the atmospheres of these planets, then Kepler-105b would need to be much more massive than Kepler-105c to retain its atmosphere, given its closer proximity to the host star. To test this hypothesis, we simultaneously analyzed radial velocities and transit-timing variations of the Kepler-105 system, measuring disparate masses of M b = 10.8 ± 2.3 M ⊕ ( ρ b = 3.68 ± 0.84 g cm −3 ) and M c = 5.6 ± 1.2 M ⊕ ( ρ c = 10.4 ± 2.39 g cm −3 ). Based on these masses, the difference in gas envelope content of the Kepler-105 planets could be entirely due to photoevaporation (in 76% of scenarios), although other mechanisms like core-powered mass loss could have played a role for some planet albedos.
ISSN:0004-6256
1538-3881
DOI:10.3847/1538-3881/ad19c6