Evaluation of a general model for multimodal unsaturated soil hydraulic properties

Many soils and other porous media exhibit dual- or multi-porosity type features. In a previous study (Seki et al., 2022) we presented multimodal water retention and closed-form hydraulic conductivity equations for such media. The objective of this study is to show that the proposed equations are pra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics 2023-03, Vol.71 (1), p.22-34
Hauptverfasser: Seki, Katsutoshi, Toride, Nobuo, van Genuchten, Martinus Th
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Many soils and other porous media exhibit dual- or multi-porosity type features. In a previous study (Seki et al., 2022) we presented multimodal water retention and closed-form hydraulic conductivity equations for such media. The objective of this study is to show that the proposed equations are practically useful. Specifically, dual-BC (Brooks and Corey)-CH (common head) (DBC), dual-VG (van Genuchten)-CH (DVC), and KO (Kosugi) BC -CH (KBC) models were evaluated for a broad range of soil types. The three models showed good agreement with measured water retention and hydraulic conductivity data over a wide range of pressure heads. Results were obtained by first optimizing water retention parameters and then optimizing the saturated hydraulic conductivity ( ) and two parameters ( , ) or ( , ) in the general hydraulic conductivity equation. Although conventionally the tortuosity factor is optimized and ( , ) fixed, sensitivity analyses showed that optimization of two parameters ( + , ) is required for the multimodal models. For 20 soils from the UNSODA database, the average for log (hydraulic conductivity) was highest (0.985) for the KBC model with = 1 and optimization of ( , , ). This result was almost equivalent (0.973) to the DVC model with = 1 and optimization of ( , , ); both were higher than for the widely used Peters model (0.956) when optimizing ( , , , ω). The proposed equations are useful for practical applications while mathematically being simple and consistent.
ISSN:1338-4333
0042-790X
1338-4333
DOI:10.2478/johh-2022-0039