Effect of an interactive educational activity using handheld ultraviolet radiation dosimeters on sun protection knowledge among Australian primary school students
•This interactive educational activity incorporated handheld UV dosimeters.•The intervention improved UV-related knowledge among primary school students.•Knowledge about the UV Index improved the most.•Knowledge about UV harms, sun protective clothing and behaviours also improved. Ultraviolet radiat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Preventive medicine reports 2022-02, Vol.25, p.101690-101690, Article 101690 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •This interactive educational activity incorporated handheld UV dosimeters.•The intervention improved UV-related knowledge among primary school students.•Knowledge about the UV Index improved the most.•Knowledge about UV harms, sun protective clothing and behaviours also improved.
Ultraviolet radiation (UV) is the main cause of skin cancer, and children are a priority group for reducing UV exposure. We evaluated whether an interactive educational activity using handheld dosimeters improved UV-related knowledge among primary (elementary) school students. We conducted an uncontrolled before-after study among 427 students in grades 3–6 (ages 8–12 years) at five schools in the Greater Sydney region, Australia. Students used UV dosimeters to measure UV exposure, using the UV index scale, at different locations on their school grounds with and without different forms of sun protection, followed by an indoor classroom presentation and discussion. A 10-point anonymous questionnaire was completed by each student before and after the entire session (60–90 min). Before-after responses were compared using a generalised linear mixed model, adjusted for school, grade and gender. Overall, the mean raw scores increased from 6.3 (out of 10) before the intervention to 8.9 after the intervention, and the adjusted difference in scores was 2.6 points (95% confidence interval 2.4–2.8; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2211-3355 2211-3355 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101690 |