Breathing-induced Errors in Quantification and Description of Dominant Intra-Prostatic Lesions (Dils) in PET Images: A Simulation Study by Means of The 4D NCAT Phantom

BackgroundRespiratory movement and the motion range of the diaphragm can affect the quality and quantity of prostate images. ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the magnitude of respiratory-induced errors to determine Dominant Intra- prostatic Lesions (DILs) in positron emission tomography (PET...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomedical physics and engineering 2022-10, Vol.12 (5), p.497-504
Hauptverfasser: Bamneshin, Khadijeh, Rabi Mahdavi, Seied, Bitarafan-Rajabi, Ahmad, Geramifar, Parham, Hejazi, Payman, Jadidi, Majid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundRespiratory movement and the motion range of the diaphragm can affect the quality and quantity of prostate images. ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the magnitude of respiratory-induced errors to determine Dominant Intra- prostatic Lesions (DILs) in positron emission tomography (PET) images. Material and MethodsIn this simulation study, we employed the 4D NURBS-based cardiac-torso (4D-NCAT) phantom with a realistic breathing model to simulate the respiratory cycles of a patient to assess the displacement, volume, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean), signal to noise ratio (SNR), and the contrast of DILs in frames within the respiratory cycle. ResultsRespiration in a diaphragm motion resulted in the maximum superior-inferior displacement of 3.9 and 6.1 mm, and the diaphragm motion amplitudes of 20 and 35 mm. In a no-motion image, the volume measurement of DILs had the smallest percentage of errors. Compared with the no-motion method, the percentages of errors in the average method in 20 and 35 mm- diaphragm motion were 25% and 105%, respectively. The motion effect was significantly reduced in terms of the values of SUVmax and SUVmean in comparison with the values of SUVmax and SUVmean in no- motion images. The contrast values in respiratory cycle frames were at a range of 3.3-19.2 mm and 6.5-46 for diaphragm movements' amplitudes of 20 and 35 mm. ConclusionThe respiratory movement errors in quantification and delineation of DILs were highly dependent on the range of motion, while the average method was not suitable to precisely delineate DILs in PET/CT in the dose-painting technique.
ISSN:2251-7200
2251-7200
DOI:10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.1912-1015