Is Emergency Remote (Online) Teaching in the First Two Years of Medical School During the COVID-19 Pandemic Serving the Purpose?

COVID-19 pandemic and closure of campuses have required a significant and rapid shift in teaching and training methods across health professions education, including remote teaching replacing face-to-face teaching. This study aims to investigate if emergency remote teaching implemented in the first...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in medical education and practice 2022-01, Vol.13, p.199-211
Hauptverfasser: Arja, Sateesh B, Fatteh, Samir, Nandennagari, Sailaja, Pemma, Sai Sarath Kumar, Ponnusamy, Kumar, Arja, Sireesha B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:COVID-19 pandemic and closure of campuses have required a significant and rapid shift in teaching and training methods across health professions education, including remote teaching replacing face-to-face teaching. This study aims to investigate if emergency remote teaching implemented in the first two years of the medical school at Avalon University School of Medicine served the purpose during the COVID-19 pandemic. The effectiveness of emergency remote teaching and on-campus teaching were compared using course evaluations (students' feedback) and students' performance in assessments. This is a concurrent mixed research method. The quantitative data collected are course evaluations and students' performance in assessments between the two semesters September 2019 (on-campus teaching) and May 2020 (emergency remote teaching). There are three semesters in the first year and two semesters in the second year of the medical program. Each semester has around 10-20 students at any given time. Quantitative data were analyzed for p-values and statistical significance using a -test. The qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results have shown no statistically significant difference (p
ISSN:1179-7258
1179-7258
DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S352599