Benefit analysis of multi-approach biomass energy utilization toward carbon neutrality

To reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, biomass has been increasingly developed as a renewable and clean alternative to fossil fuels because of its carbon-neutral characteristics. China has been investigating the rational development and use of bioenergy for developing its clean energy and achievi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Innovation (New York, NY) NY), 2023-05, Vol.4 (3), p.100423-100423, Article 100423
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Jiaoyue, Fu, Jingying, Zhao, Zhitong, Bing, Longfei, Xi, Fengming, Wang, Feng, Dong, Jiang, Wang, Shiyun, Lin, Gang, Yin, Yan, Hu, Qinqin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, biomass has been increasingly developed as a renewable and clean alternative to fossil fuels because of its carbon-neutral characteristics. China has been investigating the rational development and use of bioenergy for developing its clean energy and achieving carbon neutrality. Substituting fossil fuels with multi-source and multi-approach utilized bioenergy and corresponding carbon reduction in China remain largely unexplored. Here, a comprehensive bioenergy accounting model with a multi-dimensional analysis was developed by combining spatial, life cycle, and multi-path analyses. Accordingly, the bioenergy production potential and GHG emission reduction for each distinct type of biomass feedstock through different conversion pathways were estimated. The sum of all available organic waste (21.55 EJ yr−1) and energy plants on marginal land (11.77 EJ yr−1) in China produced 23.30 EJ of bioenergy and reduced 2,535.32 Mt CO2-eq emissions, accounting for 19.48% and 25.61% of China’s total energy production and carbon emissions in 2020, respectively. When focusing on the carbon emission mitigation potential of substituting bioenergy for conventional counterparts, bioelectricity was the most effective, and its potential was 4.45 and 8.58 times higher than that of gaseous and liquid fuel alternatives, respectively. In this study, life cycle emission reductions were maximized by a mix of bioenergy end uses based on biomass properties, with an optimal 78.56% bioenergy allocation from biodiesel, densified solid biofuel, biohydrogen, and biochar. The main regional bioenergy GHG mitigation focused on the Jiangsu, Sichuan, Guangxi, Henan, and Guangdong provinces, contributing to 31.32% of the total GHG mitigation potential. This study provides valuable guidance on exploiting untapped biomass resources in China to secure carbon neutrality by 2060. [Display omitted] •Bioenergy accounting model with a multi-dimensional analysis is developed.•Bioenergy potential takes up about 19% of China’s total energy production.•Bioenergy GHG reduction accounts for about 25% of China’s carbon emissions.•Bioenergy and GHG reduction potential are top in Guangxi autonomous region and Yunnan and Sichuan provinces.•Bioelectricity is more effective in substituting for conventional counterparts.
ISSN:2666-6758
2666-6758
DOI:10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100423