A clinical study on robot navigationassisted intramedullary nail treatment for humeral shaft fractures

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages of robot navigation system-assisted intramedullary nail treatment for humeral shaft fractures and compare it's efficacy with that of traditional surgical intramedullary nail treatment. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with hu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2024-10, Vol.25 (1), p.766-7, Article 766
Hauptverfasser: Qi, Hongfei, Ai, Xianjie, Ren, Taotao, Li, Zhong, Zhang, Chengcheng, Wu, Bo, Cui, Yu, Li, Ming
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages of robot navigation system-assisted intramedullary nail treatment for humeral shaft fractures and compare it's efficacy with that of traditional surgical intramedullary nail treatment. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with humeral shaft fractures who received intramedullary nail treatment at our centre from March 2020 to September 2022. The analysis was divided into a robot group and a traditional surgical group on the basis of whether the surgery involved a robot navigation system. We compared the baseline data (age, sex, cause of injury, fracture AO classification, and time of injury-induced surgery), intraoperative conditions (surgery time, length of main nail insertion incision, postoperative fluoroscopy frequency, intraoperative bleeding), fracture healing time, and shoulder joint function at 1 year postsurgery (ASES score and Constant-Murley score) between the two groups of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline data or average fracture healing time between the two groups of patients. However, the robotic group had significantly shorter surgical times, longer main nail incisions, fewer intraoperative fluoroscopies, and less intraoperative blood loss than did the traditional surgery group (P 
ISSN:1471-2474
1471-2474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-07848-6