Shadow study: randomized comparison of clinic with video follow-up in glioma undergoing adjuvant temozolomide therapy

This study was designed with a primary objective to study the rate of agreement in treatment plan and decisions between video follow-up (VF) and conventional clinic follow-up (CF). Adult patients with intermediate- to high-grade glioma on adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) with facilities for live video ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CNS oncology 2018-04, Vol.7 (2), p.CNS14
Hauptverfasser: Patil, Vijay M, Pande, Nikhil, Chandrasekharan, Arun, Tonse, Raees, Krishnatry, Rahul, Goda, Jayant S, Dsouza, Hollis, Vallathol, Dilip Harindran, Chakraborty, Santam, Gupta, Tejpal, Jalali, Rakesh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study was designed with a primary objective to study the rate of agreement in treatment plan and decisions between video follow-up (VF) and conventional clinic follow-up (CF). Adult patients with intermediate- to high-grade glioma on adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) with facilities for live video call were invited to participate in the study. The concurrence in decision of administering TMZ between VF and CF was 100% (p < 0.00). The median cost incurred in VF was US$58.15 while that incurred in CF was US$131.23 (p < 0.00). VF can substitute CF during adjuvant TMZ administration (CTRI/2017/01/007626).
ISSN:2045-0907
2045-0915
DOI:10.2217/cns-2017-0024