Preoperative imaging optimized for epiretinal membrane surgery

To compare imaging modalities for visualizing primary epiretinal membrane (ERM) with each other and with intraoperative digital images (IDI) after blue staining. The records of consecutive patients operated for primary ERM over a 12-month period were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative imaging in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Journal of Retina and Vitreous 2021-04, Vol.7 (1), p.32-32, Article 32
Hauptverfasser: Philippakis, Elise, Thouvenin, Raphaël, Gattoussi, Sarra, Couturier, Aude, Tadayoni, Ramin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare imaging modalities for visualizing primary epiretinal membrane (ERM) with each other and with intraoperative digital images (IDI) after blue staining. The records of consecutive patients operated for primary ERM over a 12-month period were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative imaging included color fundus photography (CFP), En Face spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), 45° infrared- (IR) and blue-reflectance (BR) scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. All images were qualitatively analyzed and scored from 0-4 according to the ability to visualize ERM details (0 = no visible ERM or vessel contraction, 1 = vessel contraction, 2 = retinal folds, 3 = ERM limits, 4 = elevated ERM edge). The preoperative ERM morphology was then compared to that seen on the IDI acquired after 1-min blue dye staining when available. Seventy eyes were included. The highest score for ERM visualization was obtained on BR and En Face OCT. A score of 3 or 4 was obtained in 68.5%, 62.1%, 17.9% and 13.6% of cases on En Face OCT, BR, CFP and IR images, respectively. IDI were available for 20 eyes, and showed a similar ERM morphology compared to preoperative images in most cases: a negative staining pattern corresponded to a plaque on En face OCT in 91% of eyes. However, IDI failed to show the ERM edges in 37.5% of cases. ERM morphology was better visualized preoperatively by BR and En Face OCT, in a similar way to the IDI after staining. Future intraoperative visualization systems could integrate both imaging modalities overlaid with the IDI for guiding ERM removal instead of staining.
ISSN:2056-9920
2056-9920
DOI:10.1186/s40942-021-00304-w