A Ku-Band Compact Offset Cylindrical Reflector Antenna with High Gain for Low-Earth Orbit Sensing Applications

The rise of CubeSats has unlocked opportunities for cutting-edge space missions with reduced costs and accelerated development timelines. CubeSats necessitate a high-gain antenna that can fit within a tightly confined space. This paper is primarily concerned with designing a compact Ku-band offset c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2024-11, Vol.24 (23), p.7535
Hauptverfasser: Esmail, Bashar A F, Isleifson, Dustin, Shafai, Lotfollah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The rise of CubeSats has unlocked opportunities for cutting-edge space missions with reduced costs and accelerated development timelines. CubeSats necessitate a high-gain antenna that can fit within a tightly confined space. This paper is primarily concerned with designing a compact Ku-band offset cylindrical reflector antenna for a CubeSat-based Earth Observation mission, with the goal of monitoring Arctic snow and sea ice. The development of a Ku-band offset cylindrical reflector, with a compact aperture of 110 × 149 mm (6.3 × 8.5 ), is described alongside a patch array feed consisting of 2 × 8 elements. The patch array feed is designed using a lightweight Rogers substrate and is utilized to test the reflector. Adopting an offset configuration helped prevent gain loss due to feed blockage. Analyzing the reflector antenna, including the feed, thorough simulations and measurements indicates that achieving a gain of 25 dBi and an aperture efficiency of 52% at 17.2 GHz is attainable. The reflector's cylindrical shape and compact size facilitate the design of a simple mechanism for reflector deployment, enabling the antenna to be stored within 1U. The array feed and reflector antenna have been fabricated and tested, demonstrating good consistency between the simulation and measurement outcomes.
ISSN:1424-8220
1424-8220
DOI:10.3390/s24237535