Do gastroenterologists have medical inertia towards coeliac disease? A UK multicentre secondary care study

ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess if there is secondary care medical inertia towards coeliac disease (CD).DesignGroup (1): Time from primary care presentation to diagnostic endoscopy was quantified in 151 adult patients with a positive endomysial antibody test and compared with 92 adult patients w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open gastroenterology 2021-01, Vol.8 (1), p.e000544
Hauptverfasser: Taylor, Matthew A, Blanshard, Rebecca J, Naylor, Gregory, Penny, Hugo A, Mooney, Peter D, Sanders, David S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess if there is secondary care medical inertia towards coeliac disease (CD).DesignGroup (1): Time from primary care presentation to diagnostic endoscopy was quantified in 151 adult patients with a positive endomysial antibody test and compared with 92 adult patients with histologically proven inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Group (2): Across four hospitals, duodenal biopsy reports for suspected CD were reviewed (n=1423). Group (3): Clinical complexity was compared between known CD (n=102) and IBD (n=99) patients at their respective follow-up clinic appointments. Group (4): 50 gastroenterologists were questioned about their perspective on CD and IBD.ResultsGroup (1): Suspected coeliac patients waited significantly longer for diagnostic endoscopy following referral (48.5 (28–89) days) than suspected patients with IBD (34.5 (18–70) days; p=0.003). Group (2): 1423 patients underwent diagnostic endoscopy for possible CD, with only 40.0% meeting guidelines to take four biopsies. Increased diagnosis of CD occurred if guidelines were followed (10.1% vs 4.6% p
ISSN:2054-4774
2054-4774
DOI:10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000544