Accelerometers-based position and time interval comparisons for predicting the behaviors of young bulls housed in a feedlot system

•Evaluated accelerometer attachment positions (halter vs. neck collar) and data transmission intervals (6–600 s) for predicting behavioral patterns in young beef cattle bulls, achieving high model performance (>0.90).•Found that using accelerometers with collars is more practical than with halter...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Smart agricultural technology 2024-12, Vol.9, p.100542, Article 100542
Hauptverfasser: Watanabe, Rafael Nakamura, Romanzini, Eliéder Prates, Bernardes, Priscila Arrigucci, Rodrigues, Julia Lisboa, Alves do Val, Guilherme, Silva, Matheus Mello, Fernandes, Márcia Helena Machado da Rocha, Caetano, Sabrina Luzia, Ramos, Salvador Boccaletti, Reis, Ricardo Andrade, Munari, Danísio Prado
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Evaluated accelerometer attachment positions (halter vs. neck collar) and data transmission intervals (6–600 s) for predicting behavioral patterns in young beef cattle bulls, achieving high model performance (>0.90).•Found that using accelerometers with collars is more practical than with halters, despite similar performance, due to ease of handling.•Suggested using datasets with fewer observations (longer intervals) for model training to reduce computational demand, training time, and battery usage. Animal behavior monitoring is an important tool for animal production. This behavior monitoring strategy can indicate the well-being and health of animals, which can lead to better productive performance. This study aimed to assess the most effective accelerometer attachment position (on either the halter or a neck collar) and data transmission time intervals (ranging from 6 to 600 s) for predicting behavioral patterns, including water and food intake frequencies, as well as other activities in young beef cattle bulls within a feedlot system. A range of machine learning algorithms were applied to satisfy the aims of the study, including the random forest, support vector machine, multilayer perceptron, and naive Bayes classifier algorithms. All studied models produced high performance metrics (above 0.90) when using both attachment positions, except for the models built using the naive Bayes classifier. Therefore, coupling accelerometers with collars is a more viable alternative for use on animals, as doing so is easier than applying accelerometers to halters. Utilizing a dataset with more observations (i.e., shorter time intervals) did not result in considerable improvements in the performance metrics of the trained models. Therefore, using datasets with fewer observations is more advantageous, as it can lead to decreased computational and temporal demands for model training, in addition to saving the battery of the device considered in this study.
ISSN:2772-3755
2772-3755
DOI:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100542