Effect of low dose acetylsalicylic acid and anticoagulant on clinical outcomes in COVID‐19, analytical cross‐sectional study
Background and aims The therapeutic strategy for the treatment of known sequelae of COVID‐19 has shifted from reactive to preventative. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and anticoagulants on COVID‐19 related morbidity and mortality. Methods This record‐bas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health science reports 2022-07, Vol.5 (4), p.e699-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and aims
The therapeutic strategy for the treatment of known sequelae of COVID‐19 has shifted from reactive to preventative. In this study, we aim to evaluate the effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), and anticoagulants on COVID‐19 related morbidity and mortality.
Methods
This record‐based analytical cross‐sectional study targeted 539 COVID‐19 patients in a single United States medical center between March and December 2020. Through a random stratified sample, we recruited outpatient (n = 206) and inpatient (n = 333) cases from three management protocols, including standard care (SC) (n = 399), low‐dose ASA only (ASA) (n = 112), and anticoagulation only (AC) (n = 28). Collected data included demographics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome measure was inpatient admission. Exploratory secondary outcome measures included length of stay, 30‐day readmission rates, medical intensive care unit (MICU) admission, need for mechanical ventilation, the occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), bleeding events, clotting events, and mortality. The collected data were coded and analyzed using standard tests.
Results
Age, mean number of comorbidities, and all individual comorbidities except for asthma, and malignancy were significantly lower in the SC compared to ASA and AC. After adjusting for age and comorbidity via binary logistic regression models, no statistical differences were found between groups for the studied outcomes. When compared to the SC group, ASA had lower 30‐day readmission rates (odds ration [OR] 0.81 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–1.88, p = 0.63), MICU admission (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.34–1.17, p = 0.32), ARDS (OR 0.71 95% CI 0.33–1.52, p = 0.38), and death (OR 0.85 95% CI 0.36–1.99, p = 0.71).
Conclusion
Low‐dose ASA has a nonsignificant but potentially protective role in reducing the risk of COVID‐19 related morbidity and mortality. Our data suggests a trend toward reduced 30‐day readmission rates, ARDS, MICU admissions, need for mechanical ventilation, and mortality compared to the standard management protocol. Further randomized control trials are needed to establish causal effects. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2398-8835 2398-8835 |
DOI: | 10.1002/hsr2.699 |