Removal of intraocular foreign body in anterior chamber angle with prism contact lens and 23-gauge foreign body forceps

AIM:To introduce a novel approach in removal of anterior chamber angle foreign body(ACFB) using a prism contact lens and 23-gauge foreign body forceps.METHODS:Data of 42 eyes of 42 patients who had undergone removal of ACFB using a prism contact lens and 23-gauge foreign body forceps from January 20...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of ophthalmology 2017-05, Vol.10 (5), p.749-753
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Yan-Ming, Yan, Hua, Cai, Jin-Hong, Li, Hai-Bo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:AIM:To introduce a novel approach in removal of anterior chamber angle foreign body(ACFB) using a prism contact lens and 23-gauge foreign body forceps.METHODS:Data of 42 eyes of 42 patients who had undergone removal of ACFB using a prism contact lens and 23-gauge foreign body forceps from January 2008 to October 2013 were collected and analyzed. Twenty eyes in group A received the conventional approach by using toothed forceps through corneal limbus incision, and 22 eyes in group B underwent the novel method through the opposite corneal limbus incision. RESULTS:The success rate of ACFB once removal was 75%(15/20) in group A, and 100%(22/22) in group B. The average operation time of group A was significantly longer compared with group B(34.9±9.88 min vs 22.13±8.85min; P〈0.05). The average size of corneal limbus incision in group A was significantly larger than that of group B(4.85±1.89 mm vs 3.95±1.17 mm; P〈0.05). The corneal limbus incision suturing were conducted in all eyes in group A, and only 5 eyes in group B. CONCLUSION:Removal of ACFB using a prism contact lens and 23-gauge foreign body forceps is a safer, more effective, and convenient technique compared with the conventional approach.
ISSN:2222-3959
2227-4898
DOI:10.18240/ijo.2017.05.15