Inadvertent pulmonary aspiration of endodontic hand instrument -procedural negligence and litigation: Case report
Aspiration/ingestion in dentistry is rare but serious complication. Dentist should be tremendously conscientious during any intercession, especially in supine position and the management of small instrument. A 21-year-old male patient reported in apprehension with a complaint of aspiration/ingestion...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Saudi Endodontic Journal 2021-01, Vol.11 (3), p.412-417 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aspiration/ingestion in dentistry is rare but serious complication. Dentist should be tremendously conscientious during any intercession, especially in supine position and the management of small instrument. A 21-year-old male patient reported in apprehension with a complaint of aspiration/ingestion of endodontic hand file instrument while undergoing root canal treatment. A prompt Non-Contrast Computed Tomography of the thorax was done, which discovered an endodontic file in the right bronchus. The patient was well-versed about the existence of the instrument and was instantly admitted to the Pulmonary Medicine Department. High-risk consent was duly signed by the patient before treatment. Flexible fiberoptic Bronchoscopy was considered for retrieval of the instrument under local anesthesia. A successful bronchoscopy was performed, and the endodontic instrument was retrieved. The patient was kept under observation for any symptoms. Follow-up chest-X ray done immediately and after 6 months. Consequently, focused Ethical standard practice guidelines, including rubber dam isolation, should be followed in dentistry/endodontic procedure to lessen unreasonable, difficult perilous situations, and negligence litigations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1658-5984 2320-1495 2320-1495 |
DOI: | 10.4103/sej.sej_156_20 |