Comparison of Clinical Codes with Standards of Genitourinary Disease in Public Hospital of Sidoarjo

The accuracy of data diagnosis is important for clinical data management, reimbursement, and  issues related to healthcare and services. Based on preliminary observations, it was found that the inaccuracy of the diagnosis code maker with the genitourinary disease standard at the  Sidarjo District Ho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prisma sains (Online) 2023-04, Vol.11 (2), p.368-375
Hauptverfasser: Fauzia, Vina, Nisak, Umi Khoirun, Cholifah, Cholifah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The accuracy of data diagnosis is important for clinical data management, reimbursement, and  issues related to healthcare and services. Based on preliminary observations, it was found that the inaccuracy of the diagnosis code maker with the genitourinary disease standard at the  Sidarjo District Hospital. The purpose of this study was to find out the comparison of coder clinical codes with genitourinary disease standards at the sidoarjo district hospital. The method used was quantitative with random sampling techniques presented  in the form of frequency tables and cross tabulations and tested using the chi-square test. This study used medical records for inpatient genitourinary cases in 2022,   with a total sample of 80 medical records. The results showed that completeness, timeliness,  and accuracy had a significant influence on coding accuracy. Completness ( completeness of  supporting information) obtained 58,8% complete medical record documents and 51.3% incomplete medical record documents (p=0.012). Accuracy (coding accuracy):52.5% of medical  record documents were accurate and 47.5% of medical record documents were inaccurate  (p=0,0001). This study suggests improving the quality of coding by conducting coding training  and evaluating coding audits to support coding speed.
ISSN:2338-4530
2540-7899
DOI:10.33394/j-ps.v11i2.7494