Communicating climate change and biodiversity loss with local populations: exploring communicative utopias in eight transdisciplinary case studies

Climate change and biodiversity loss trigger policies targeting and impacting local communities worldwide. However, research and policy implementation often fail to sufficiently consider community responses and to involve them. We present the results of a collective self-assessment exercise for eigh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:UCL Open environment 2023-01, Vol.5 (1), p.e064-e064
Hauptverfasser: Ansari, Dawud, Schönenberg, Regine, Abud, Melissa, Becerra, Laura, Brahim, Wassim, Castiblanco, Javier, de la Vega-Leinert, Anne Cristina, Dudley, Nigel, Dunlop, Michael, Figueroa, Carolina, Guevara, Oscar, Hauser, Philipp, Hobbie, Hannes, Hossain, Mostafa A.R., Hugé, Jean, Janssens de Bisthoven, Luc, Keunen, Hilde, Munera-Roldan, Claudia, Petzold, Jan, Rochette, Anne-Julie, Schmidt, Matthew, Schumann, Charlotte, Sengupta, Sayanti, Stoll-Kleemann, Susanne, van Kerkhoff, Lorrae, Vanhove, Maarten P.M., Wyborn, Carina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Climate change and biodiversity loss trigger policies targeting and impacting local communities worldwide. However, research and policy implementation often fail to sufficiently consider community responses and to involve them. We present the results of a collective self-assessment exercise for eight case studies of communications with regard to climate change or biodiversity loss between project teams and local communities. We develop eight indicators of good stakeholder communication, reflecting the scope of Verran’s (2002) concept of postcolonial moments as a communicative utopia. We demonstrate that applying our indicators can enhance communication and enable community responses. However, we discover a divergence between timing, complexity and (introspective) effort. Three cases qualify for postcolonial moments, but scrutinising power relations and genuine knowledge co-production remain rare. While we verify the potency of various instruments for deconstructing science, their sophistication cannot substitute trust building and epistemic/transdisciplinary awareness. Lastly, we consider that reforming inadequate funding policies helps improving the work in and with local communities.
ISSN:2632-0886
2632-0886
DOI:10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000064