Using an objective computer task (QbTest) to aid the identification of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in the Children and Young People Secure Estate (CYPSE): a feasibility randomised controlled trial

ObjectivesQbTest has been shown to improve time to decision/diagnosis for young people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The aim was to assess the feasibility of QbTest for young people in prison.DesignSingle-centre feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), with 1:1 allocati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2022-12, Vol.12 (12), p.e064951-e064951
Hauptverfasser: Chitsabesan, Prathiba, Hall, Charlotte Lucy, Carter, Lesley-Anne, Reeves, Mindy, Mohammed, Vaseem, Beresford, Bryony, Young, Susan, Kraam, Abdullah, Trowse, Sally, Wilkinson-Cunningham, Lloyd, Lennox, Charlotte
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectivesQbTest has been shown to improve time to decision/diagnosis for young people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The aim was to assess the feasibility of QbTest for young people in prison.DesignSingle-centre feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), with 1:1 allocation. Concealed random allocation using an online pseudorandom list with random permuted blocks of varying sizes.SettingOne Young Offenders Institution in England.Participants355 young people aged 15–18 years displaying possible symptoms of ADHD were assessed for eligibility, 69 were eligible to take part and 60 were randomised.InterventionQbTest—a computer task measuring attention, activity and impulsivity.Main outcome measuresEligibility, recruitment and retention rates and acceptability of randomisation and trial participation.ResultsOf the 355 young people assessed for eligibility, 69 were eligible and 60 were randomised (n=30 QbTest plus usual care; n=30 usual care alone). The study achieved the specified recruitment target. Trial participation and randomisation were deemed acceptable by the majority of participants. 78% of young people were followed up at 3 months, but only 32% at 6 months, although this was also affected by COVID-19 restrictions. Secondary outcomes were mixed. Participants including clinical staff were mostly supportive of the study and QbTest; however, some young people found QbTest hard and there were issues with implementation of the ADHD care pathway. There were no serious adverse events secondary to the study or intervention and no one was withdrawn from the study due to an adverse event.ConclusionsWith adaptations, a fully powered RCT may be achievable to evaluate the effectiveness of QbTest in the assessment of ADHD in the Children and Young People Secure Estate, with time to decision (days) as the primary outcome measure. However, further programme developmental work is required to address some of the challenges highlighted prior to a larger trial.Trial registration numberISRCTN17402196.
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064951