Accuracy of immediate antepartum ultrasound estimated fetal weight and its impact on mode of delivery and outcome - a cohort analysis

The aim of the study was to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound-derived estimated fetal weight (EFW) and to determine its impact on management and outcome of delivery. In this single-center cohort analysis, women with a singleton term pregnancy in the beginning stages of labor were included. Wome...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2018-05, Vol.18 (1), p.118-118, Article 118
Hauptverfasser: Stubert, Johannes, Peschel, Adam, Bolz, Michael, Glass, Änne, Gerber, Bernd
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of the study was to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound-derived estimated fetal weight (EFW) and to determine its impact on management and outcome of delivery. In this single-center cohort analysis, women with a singleton term pregnancy in the beginning stages of labor were included. Women with immediately antepartum EFW (N = 492) were compared to women without ultrasound (N = 515). EFW was correct (deviation from birth weight ≤ 10%) in 72.2% (355/492) of patients with fetal biometry; 19.7% (97/492) were underestimated, and 8.1% (40/492) were overestimated. Newborns with a lower birth weight were more frequently overestimated, and newborns with higher birth weight were more frequently underestimated. The mean difference between EFW and real birth weight was - 114.5 g (standard deviation ±313 g, 95% confidence interval 87.1-142.0). The rate of non-reassuring fetal heart tracing (9.8% vs. 1.9%, P 
ISSN:1471-2393
1471-2393
DOI:10.1186/s12884-018-1772-7