Evaluation of the Overall Quality of the Health Technology Assessment Educational Program from the Perspectives of University Professors and Learners in Iran

Background: Failure to evaluate, examine, and assess the requirements and determine the quality level of the educational program of educational fields will result in low-quality and obsolete curricula. It will prevent the academic areas from achieving their goals. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the overall quality level of the health technology assessment (HTA) educational program from the perspectives of university professors and students. Methods: The study was conducted with 127 university professors, students, and HTA graduates at Tehran, Iran, Kerman, and Yazd Universities of Medical Sciences. A researcher-made questionnaire did the data collection. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the entire questionnaire was 91%, and the intra-domain correlation coefficient was 87%, indicating that the instrument was appropriate. The data were analyzed with descriptive and analytical tests based on their normality or non-normality using Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman test and ANOVA or two-way ANOVA. Results: This research was completed by 114 out of 127 participants. According to a review of diverse perspectives, the quality of the educational program in terms of design elements in special courses and executive elements in compensatory courses was within the range of average (1.66< mean 2.32). In addition, the majority of executive elements from special courses and design elements from compensatory classes were in an unfavorable position, with a (1.66> mean) the average position (1.66< mean