Functional Differences between E. coli and ESKAPE Pathogen GroES/GroEL
As the GroES/GroEL chaperonin system is the only bacterial chaperone that is essential under all conditions, we have been interested in the development of GroES/GroEL inhibitors as potential antibiotics. Using GroES/GroEL as a surrogate, we have discovered several classes of GroES/GroEL inhibitors t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | mBio 2021-01, Vol.12 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | As the GroES/GroEL chaperonin system is the only bacterial chaperone that is essential under all conditions, we have been interested in the development of GroES/GroEL inhibitors as potential antibiotics. Using
GroES/GroEL as a surrogate, we have discovered several classes of GroES/GroEL inhibitors that show potent antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. However, it remains unknown if
GroES/GroEL is functionally identical to other GroES/GroEL chaperonins and hence if our inhibitors will function against other chaperonins. Herein we report our initial efforts to characterize the GroES/GroEL chaperonins from clinically significant ESKAPE pathogens (
,
,
,
,
, and
species). We used complementation experiments in GroES/GroEL-deficient and -null
strains to report on exogenous ESKAPE chaperone function. In GroES/GroEL-deficient (but not knocked-out)
, we found that only a subset of the ESKAPE GroES/GroEL chaperone systems could complement to produce a viable organism. Surprisingly, GroES/GroEL chaperone systems from two of the ESKAPE pathogens were found to complement in
, but only in the strict absence of either
GroEL (
) or both
GroES and GroEL (
). In addition, GroES/GroEL from
was unable to complement
GroES/GroEL under all conditions. The resulting viable strains, in which
was replaced with ESKAPE
, demonstrated similar growth kinetics to wild-type
, but displayed an elongated phenotype (potentially indicating compromised GroEL function) at some temperatures. These results suggest functional differences between GroES/GroEL chaperonins despite high conservation of amino acid identity.
The GroES/GroEL chaperonin from
has long served as the model system for other chaperonins. This assumption seemed valid because of the high conservation between the chaperonins. It was, therefore, shocking to discover ESKAPE pathogen GroES/GroEL formed mixed-complex chaperonins in the presence of
GroES/GroEL, leading to loss of organism viability in some cases. Complete replacement of
with ESKAPE
restored organism viability, but produced an elongated phenotype, suggesting differences in chaperonin function, including client specificity and/or refolding cycle rates. These data offer important mechanistic insight into these remarkable machines, and the new strains developed allow for the synthesis of homogeneous chaperonins for biochemical studies and to further our efforts to develop chaperonin-targeted antibiotics. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2161-2129 2150-7511 |
DOI: | 10.1128/mBio.02167-20 |