Performance improvement of hybrid photovoltaic/thermal systems: A metaheuristic artificial intelligence approach to select the best model using 10E analysis
•Seven simplified PVT hybrid system models are presented.•The performances of seven PV/T models are evaluated.•A 10E analysis of the different PV/T models is carried out.•Optimization of a bifacial PV/T system.•A numerical AG/MOPSO selection model is developed.•An implementation of the hybrid AG/MOP...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Solar Energy Advances 2024, Vol.4, p.100061, Article 100061 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Seven simplified PVT hybrid system models are presented.•The performances of seven PV/T models are evaluated.•A 10E analysis of the different PV/T models is carried out.•Optimization of a bifacial PV/T system.•A numerical AG/MOPSO selection model is developed.•An implementation of the hybrid AG/MOPSO model for the selection of the optimal PV/T.
Photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) hybrid systems have until now encountered a real problem of sustainability-energy-cost concordance. Faced with this situation, new types of designs are in full expansion aimed at filling the limits of some. This therefore involves a very appropriate decision-making process. The energy, exergy, economic, environmental, energo-environmental, exergo-environmental, enviro-economic, energy-enviro-economic, exergo-enviro-economic and ergonomic analysis is carried out on seven PV/T configurations and therefore the simplified models are presented for a better interpretation of the mechanisms from different perspectives and the integration of a selection algorithm. Thus, an optimal selection methodology using the hybridization of genetic algorithms and multi-objective optimization by particle swarms based on ten performance indicators is proposed. The results obtained with good convergence and precision allow us to observe that the Air PV/T model is better. However, the study shows good viability of PV/T models with a cost of energy and a return on investment time all lower than 0.1$/kWh and 3 years, respectively. Models with phase change materials (PCM) minimize thermal losses better than those with air, nanofluids or thermoelectric generator (TEG). The bifacial model stands out with a good energy-environmental balance compared to the water model which has a better durability index greater than 2.0 and a good ergonomic factor. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2667-1131 2667-1131 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.seja.2024.100061 |