Barriers to Documenting Experiences in the Public Libraries of Qom Province

Purpose: Documentation is an attempt to converting tacit knowledge to explicit one. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying and ranking the barriers to documenting experiences in the public libraries of Qom province. Methods: In terms of research type, this is an applied study conducted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:تحقیقات اطلاع‌رسانی و کتابخانه‌های عمومی 2024-06, Vol.30 (2), p.158-174
Hauptverfasser: Nazila Mehrabi, Atefeh Sharif
Format: Artikel
Sprache:per
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Documentation is an attempt to converting tacit knowledge to explicit one. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying and ranking the barriers to documenting experiences in the public libraries of Qom province. Methods: In terms of research type, this is an applied study conducted using an exploratory mixed-method approach. Methodologically, it is descriptive-analytical, and the Delphi survey and a general survey approach were used simultaneously. In the Delphi stage, the barriers to documentation were identified, and the ranking of barriers was identified during the survey phase. The research includes two statistical populations: subject matter experts, and managers and staff of public libraries in Qom province. A purposive sample was selected from the first group and 66 individuals were randomly chosen from the second group. After reviewing the literature, the initial checklist of identified barriers to documentation was provided to the panel members and the output from the Delphi panel stage was used to create the questionnaire. The accuracy and reliability of qualitative data were assessed based on the criteria of validity, reliability, confirmability, and transferability, while the validity of the questionnaire was assessed through content validity. For this purpose, the questionnaire was approved by three faculty members specializing in information science and knowledge studies. Cronbach's alpha was also used to confirm the reliability of the questionnaire, with a reported value of .949. Findings: The findings of the present study showed that the barriers can be categorized into seven groups: individual barriers, educational barriers, organizational culture barriers, organizational structure barriers, technological barriers, economic barriers, and social barriers. Among the indicators of individual barriers, the lack of a sense of responsibility for documentation among staff and managers, as well as the lack of sufficient motivation, reliance on one's own memory, and the perception that the organization does not need these experiences were highlighted. Among the indicators of educational barriers, the lack of attention to the benefits and advantages of documentation by educational managers, as well as the absence of conferences and meetings related to documentation were highlighted. Among the indicators of organizational culture barriers, the lack of necessary support from managers was noted. Among the indicators of organizational
ISSN:2645-5730
2645-6117