MediScan: A Framework of U-Health and Prognostic AI Assessment on Medical Imaging

With technological advancements, remarkable progress has been made with the convergence of health sciences and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Modern health systems are proposed to ease patient diagnostics. However, the challenge is to provide AI-based precautions to patients and doctors for more accu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of imaging 2024-12, Vol.10 (12), p.322
Hauptverfasser: Syed, Sibtain, Ahmed, Rehan, Iqbal, Arshad, Ahmad, Naveed, Alshara, Mohammed Ali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:With technological advancements, remarkable progress has been made with the convergence of health sciences and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Modern health systems are proposed to ease patient diagnostics. However, the challenge is to provide AI-based precautions to patients and doctors for more accurate risk assessment. The proposed healthcare system aims to integrate patients, doctors, laboratories, pharmacies, and administrative personnel use cases and their primary functions onto a single platform. The proposed framework can also process microscopic images, CT scans, X-rays, and MRI to classify malignancy and give doctors a set of AI precautions for patient risk assessment. The proposed framework incorporates various DCNN models for identifying different forms of tumors and fractures in the human body i.e., brain, bones, lungs, kidneys, and skin, and generating precautions with the help of the Fined-Tuned Large Language Model (LLM) i.e., Generative Pretrained Transformer 4 (GPT-4). With enough training data, DCNN can learn highly representative, data-driven, hierarchical image features. The GPT-4 model is selected for generating precautions due to its explanation, reasoning, memory, and accuracy on prior medical assessments and research studies. Classification models are evaluated by classification report (i.e., Recall, Precision, F1 Score, Support, Accuracy, and Macro and Weighted Average) and confusion matrix and have shown robust performance compared to the conventional schemes.
ISSN:2313-433X
2313-433X
DOI:10.3390/jimaging10120322