Intraoperative pelvic tilt and axial rotation during total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach is affected by the acetabular retractor and cup impactor

Intraoperative pelvic motion during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine position affects acetabular cup placement and occurs at each step of THA; however, there are no reports of pelvic motion changes during each stage of THA via the direct anterior approach (DAA). This study aimed to evaluat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroplasty today 2023-12, Vol.24, p.101251-101251, Article 101251
Hauptverfasser: Mouri, Kanto, Madachi, Atsushi, Karita, Tatsuro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Intraoperative pelvic motion during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine position affects acetabular cup placement and occurs at each step of THA; however, there are no reports of pelvic motion changes during each stage of THA via the direct anterior approach (DAA). This study aimed to evaluate pelvic motion at each step of THA through the DAA. From March to October 2022, 71 hips were prospectively measured for intraoperative pelvic tilt and axial rotation during THA through the DAA at a single center. These parameters were measured during each surgical step using the AR-Hip navigation system. Both pelvic tilt and axial rotation were maximal during acetabular cup placement. The mean intraoperative pelvic tilt and axial rotation during cup placement were 4.8 ± 2.6° (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.19–5.41°) and 4.2 ± 3.3° (95% CI, 3.42–4.98°), respectively. The effects of the acetabular retractor and cup impactor on pelvic tilt and axial rotation were comparable. Spearman’s correlation tests showed significant correlation between axial rotation and body mass index (r = -0.444, p = 0.00011). The pelvis tilts forward and rotates towards the surgical side during THA through the DAA. The effects of the acetabular retractor and cup impactor on pelvic motion are comparable. Cup implantation must take into account pelvic movement, and it must be recognized that the pelvis is moving at that time, even with only the acetabular retractor inserted, compared to before the skin incision.
ISSN:2352-3441
2352-3441
DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2023.101251