Validation of lake surface state in the HIRLAM v.7.4 numerical weather prediction model against in situ measurements in Finland
The High Resolution Limited Area Model (HIRLAM), used for the operational numerical weather prediction in the Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), includes prognostic treatment of lake surface state since 2012. Forecast is based on the Freshwater Lake (FLake) model integrated into HIRLAM. Additio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geoscientific Model Development 2019-08, Vol.12 (8), p.3707-3723 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The High Resolution Limited Area Model (HIRLAM), used for the operational
numerical weather prediction in the Finnish Meteorological Institute
(FMI), includes prognostic treatment of lake surface state since
2012. Forecast is based on the Freshwater Lake (FLake) model
integrated into HIRLAM. Additionally, an independent objective
analysis of lake surface water temperature (LSWT) combines the short
forecast of FLake to observations from the Finnish Environment
Institute (SYKE). The resulting description of lake surface state –
forecast FLake variables and analysed LSWT – was compared to SYKE
observations of lake water temperature, freeze-up and break-up dates,
and the ice thickness and snow depth for 2012–2018 over 45
lakes in Finland. During the ice-free period, the predicted LSWT
corresponded to the observations with a slight overestimation, with a
systematic error of +0.91 K. The colder temperatures were
underrepresented and the maximum temperatures were too high. The
objective analysis of LSWT was able to reduce the bias to
+0.35 K. The predicted freeze-up dates corresponded well to the observed
dates, mostly within the accuracy of a week. The forecast break-up
dates were far too early, typically several weeks ahead of the
observed dates. The growth of ice thickness after freeze-up was
generally overestimated. However, practically no predicted snow
appeared on lake ice. The absence of snow, presumably due to an
incorrect security coefficient value, is suggested to be also the main
reason for the inaccurate simulation of the lake ice melting in spring. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1991-9603 1991-959X 1991-962X 1991-9603 1991-962X |
DOI: | 10.5194/gmd-12-3707-2019 |