A systematic review and meta-analysis on antimicrobial resistance in marine bivalves
Bivalves are filter-feeding animals able to accumulate contaminants and microorganisms, either of marine or terrestrial origin. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacterial isolates from bivalves using a systematic review of the literature. Comp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in microbiology 2022-12, Vol.13, p.1040568-1040568 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Bivalves are filter-feeding animals able to accumulate contaminants and microorganisms, either of marine or terrestrial origin. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacterial isolates from bivalves using a systematic review of the literature. Comprehensive searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science were carried out, based upon a registered protocol (PROSPERO), and following the preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using a modified Hoy checklist. Meta-analyses of prevalence were carried out using random-effects models. In total, 103 articles were selected from 1,280 records and were included in the final analysis. The studies were from Asia (
= 54), Europe (
= 27), South and North America (
= 10 and
= 6, respectively), Africa (
= 2), Oceania (
= 1), and multicentre and intercontinental (
= 3). The meta-analysis of multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index revealed
spp. as the genus with the highest prevalence of AMR (37%), followed by
spp. (34%),
spp. (18%), and
(15%). Resistance to third/fourth/fifth generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, two highest priority, critically important antimicrobials (HPCIA), was recorded in approximately 10% of
.
isolates. Resistance to carbapenems was very low ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1664-302X 1664-302X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1040568 |