Swim‐up method is superior to density gradient centrifugation for preserving sperm DNA integrity during sperm processing

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effects of swim‐up and density gradient centrifugation methods on sperm DNA fragmentation. Methods Nineteen normozoospermic patient samples with ≥100 × 106 motile sperms were included in this study. Sperm DNA fragmentation, progressive motility, and progressi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reproductive medicine and biology 2024-01, Vol.23 (1), p.e12562-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Amano, Kenji, Oigawa, Satoko, Ichizawa, Koichiro, Tokuda, Yukiko, Unagami, Mami, Sekiguchi, Mami, Furui, Mayuko, Nakaoka, Kentaro, Ito, Ayumu, Hayashi, Rika, Tamaki, Yuko, Hayashi, Yuko, Fukuda, Yusuke, Katagiri, Yukiko, Nakata, Masahiko, Nagao, Koichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the effects of swim‐up and density gradient centrifugation methods on sperm DNA fragmentation. Methods Nineteen normozoospermic patient samples with ≥100 × 106 motile sperms were included in this study. Sperm DNA fragmentation, progressive motility, and progressive motile sperm number were measured before and after the swim‐up method or density gradient centrifugation. Results Sperm DNA fragmentation was not statistically different between swim‐up—(14.4 ± 2.1%, p = 0.32) and density gradient centrifugation‐processed (25.0 ± 3.0%, p = 0.20) and unprocessed semen samples (19.2 ± 1.9%). Sperm DNA fragmentation was significantly lower in swim‐up—than in density gradient centrifugation‐processed samples (p 
ISSN:1445-5781
1447-0578
DOI:10.1002/rmb2.12562