Insertion Site Dilemma: Rethinking Radial Arterial Catheter Placement for Device Resilience

The study by Marie et al (2023) discusses their outcomes regarding the distance of radial arterial catheters from the radiocarpal joint and its association to device failure, although authors found no significant difference in failure rates between catheters inserted proximally or distally to the ra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care explorations 2024-01, Vol.6 (1), p.e1037-e1037
Hauptverfasser: Spencer, Timothy R, Imbriaco, Guglielmo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The study by Marie et al (2023) discusses their outcomes regarding the distance of radial arterial catheters from the radiocarpal joint and its association to device failure, although authors found no significant difference in failure rates between catheters inserted proximally or distally to the radiocarpal joint. However, other recent studies have reported that catheters inserted more distally are more likely to fail, with rates high as 25%. Factors that contribute to failure include poor site selection, infection, device occlusion, or dislodgement. With reliance on accurate hemodynamics from arterial catheters, providers should be aware of the risks and take steps to minimize them, as catheter failure is more than just associated infection, the inability to aspirate blood or a useable arterial waveform. Optimal insertion location, use of ultrasound-guided techniques, appropriate securement, and close monitoring of the catheter, along with accurate reporting of failure reasons, will help clarify future research outcomes.
ISSN:2639-8028
2639-8028
DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001037