The optimal degree of lateral wedge insoles for reducing knee joint load: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lateral wedge insoles are traditionally used to reduce the adduction moment that crosses the knee during walking in people with medial knee osteoarthritis. However, the best degree to reduce knee joint load is not yet well established. Electronic databases were searched from their inception until Ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of Physiotherapy 2019-12, Vol.9 (1), p.18-18, Article 18
Hauptverfasser: Ferreira, Vitor, Simões, Rita, Gonçalves, Rui Soles, Machado, Leandro, Roriz, Paulo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Lateral wedge insoles are traditionally used to reduce the adduction moment that crosses the knee during walking in people with medial knee osteoarthritis. However, the best degree to reduce knee joint load is not yet well established. Electronic databases were searched from their inception until May 2017. Included studies reported on the immediate biomechanical effects of different degrees of lateral wedge insoles during walking in people with knee osteoarthritis. The main measures of interest relating to the biomechanics were the first and second peak of external knee adduction moment and knee adduction angular impulse. For the comparison of the biomechanical effects of different degrees of insoles, the studies were divided in three subgroups: insoles with a degree higher than 0° and equal to or lower than 5°; insoles higher than 5° and equal to or lower than 9°; and insoles higher than 9°. Eligible studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Fifteen studies with a total of 415 participants met all eligibility criteria and were included in the final review and meta-analysis. The overall effect suggests that lateral wedge insoles resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the first peak (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.36, - 0.13;  
ISSN:2057-0082
2057-0082
DOI:10.1186/s40945-019-0068-1