18F-FDG-PET-MRI for the assessment of acute intestinal graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD)

Background Graft versus host disease (GvHD) is a frequent complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), significantly increasing mortality. Previous imaging studies focused on the assessment of intestinal GvHD with contrast-enhanced MRI/CT or .sup.18F-FDG-PET imaging alone. The obj...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC cancer 2021-09, Vol.21 (1), p.1-1015, Article 1015
Hauptverfasser: Roll, Wolfgang, Schindler, Philipp, Masthoff, Max, Strotmann, Rebecca, Albring, Jörn, Reicherts, Christian, Weckesser, Matthias, Noto, Benjamin, Stelljes, Matthias, Schäfers, Michael, Evers, Georg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Graft versus host disease (GvHD) is a frequent complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), significantly increasing mortality. Previous imaging studies focused on the assessment of intestinal GvHD with contrast-enhanced MRI/CT or .sup.18F-FDG-PET imaging alone. The objective of this retrospective study was to elucidate the diagnostic value of a combined .sup.18F-FDG-PET-MRI protocol in patients with acute intestinal GvHD. Methods Between 2/2015 and 8/2019, 21 patients with acute intestinal GvHD underwent .sup.18F-FDG-PET-MRI. PET, MRI and PET-MRI datasets were independently reviewed. Readers assessed the number of affected segments of the lower gastrointestinal tract and the reliability of the diagnosis on a 5-point Likert scale and quantitative PET (SUVmax, SUVpeak, metabolic volume (MV)) and MRI parameter (wall thickness), were correlated to clinical staging of acute intestinal GvHD. Results The detection rate for acute intestinal GvHD was 56.8% for PET, 61.4% for MRI and 100% for PET-MRI. PET-MRI (median Likert-scale value: 5; range: 4-5) offers a significantly higher reliability of the diagnosis compared to PET (median: 4; range: 2-5; p = 0.01) and MRI alone (median: 4; range: 3-5; p = 0.03). The number of affected segments in PET-MRI (r.sub.s = 0.677; p < 0.001) and the MV (r.sub.s = 0.703; p < 0.001) correlated significantly with the clinical stage. SUVmax (r.sub.s = 0.345; p = 0.14), SUVpeak (r.sub.s = 0.276; p = 0.24) and wall thickening (r.sub.s = 0.174; p = 0.17) did not show a significant correlation to clinical stage. Conclusion .sup.18F-FDG-PET-MRI allows for highly reliable assessment of acute intestinal GvHD and adds information indicating clinical severity. Keywords: GvHD, PET-MRI, Inflammation, FDG
ISSN:1471-2407
1471-2407
DOI:10.1186/s12885-021-08748-x