Staged ventricular recruitment and biventricular conversion following single-ventricle palliation in unbalanced atrioventricular canal defectsCentral MessagePerspective

Objective: Restoration of biventricular circulation is an alternative management strategy in unbalanced atrioventricular canal defects (uAVCDs), especially in patients with risk factors for single-ventricle palliation (SVP) failure. When ventricular volume is inadequate for biventricular circulation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JTCVS open 2023-03, Vol.13, p.278-291
Hauptverfasser: Nicholas A. Oh, MD, Ilias P. Doulamis, MD, Alvise Guariento, MD, Breanna Piekarski, BSN, RN, Gerald R. Marx, MD, Pedro J. del Nido, MD, Sitaram M. Emani, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: Restoration of biventricular circulation is an alternative management strategy in unbalanced atrioventricular canal defects (uAVCDs), especially in patients with risk factors for single-ventricle palliation (SVP) failure. When ventricular volume is inadequate for biventricular circulation, recruitment procedures may accommodate its growth. In this study, we review our uAVCD experience with biventricular conversion (BIVC) after prior SVP. Methods: This is a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of uAVCD patients who underwent BIVC after SVP, with staged recruitment (staged) or primary BIVC (direct) between 2003 to 2018. Mortality, unplanned reinterventions, imaging, and catheterization data were analyzed. Results: Sixty-five patients underwent BIVC from SVP (17 stage 1, 42 bidirectional Glenn, and 6 Fontan). Decision for conversion was based on poor SVP candidacy (n = 43) or 2 adequately sized ventricles (n = 22). Of the 65 patients, 20 patients underwent recruitment before conversion. The staged group had more severe ventricular hypoplasia than the direct group, reflected in prestaging end-diastolic volume z scores (–4.0 vs –2.6; P 
ISSN:2666-2736
2666-2736