Comparison and critical assessment of single-cell Hi-C protocols
Advances in single-cell sequencing technologies make it possible to study the genome architecture in single cells. The rapid growth of the field has been fueled by the development of innovative single-cell Hi-C protocols. However, the protocols vary considerably in their efficiency, bias, scale and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heliyon 2022-10, Vol.8 (10), p.e11023-e11023, Article e11023 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Advances in single-cell sequencing technologies make it possible to study the genome architecture in single cells. The rapid growth of the field has been fueled by the development of innovative single-cell Hi-C protocols. However, the protocols vary considerably in their efficiency, bias, scale and costs, and their relative advantages for different applications are unclear.
Here, we compare the two most commonly used single-cell Hi-C protocols. We use long-read sequencing to analyze molecular products of the Hi-C assay and show that whole-genome amplification step results in increased number of artifacts, larger coverage biases, and increased amount of noise compared to PCR-based amplification. Our comparison provides guidance for researchers studying chromatin architecture in individual cells.
Single-cell Hi-C; Genome architecture; Chicken; Oocyte. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2405-8440 2405-8440 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11023 |