KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF INDIVIDUAL MEDALISTS IN RHYTHMIC GYMNASTICS COMPETING AT THE 2020 OLYMPIC GAMES
This study aims to analyze the contribution of each apparatus' score component to the overall score and to identify the key performance indicators that distinguish medalists from non-medalists among the 10 finalists in rhythmic gymnastics at the 2020 Olympic Games, Tokyo. Medalists (n=3) and no...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science of gymnastics journal 2023-10, Vol.15 (3), p.409-425 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study aims to analyze the contribution of each apparatus' score component to the overall score and to identify the key performance indicators that distinguish medalists from non-medalists among the 10 finalists in rhythmic gymnastics at the 2020 Olympic Games, Tokyo. Medalists (n=3) and non-medalists (n=7) were separated in the sample. Each apparatus (hoop/ball/clubs/ribbon) had seven components [body difficulty (DB), apparatus difficulty (DA), D total, artistic execution (EA), execution technical (ET), E total, total score (TS) of apparatus, and a total final score (TFS-sum of four apparatus scores)]. A total of 350 scores were analyzed. The Mann–Whitney U tests and Cohen's d effect size (ES) calculation were used to calculate differences. The following variables were determined to differentiate the TFS of the medalist and the non-medalist gymnasts: the large effect with Ball-DA/D total/EA/E total/TS (ES=1.550–1.879), Clubs-DA/D total/EA/TS (ES=0.316–2.080), Hoop-DA/D total/TS (ES=1.897–2.316), Ribbon-EA (ES=1.879), and with a low-effect Clubs-AD(ES=0.316) components. Hoop-DA and Hoop-D-TS (ES=2.316, p< 0.05) have the greatest impact, while all DB and ET scores (p>0.05) have no effect on TFS. The impact of apparatus-specific score components on Olympic medal outcomes varies significantly. Notably, difficulty scores (both total and apparatus-specific) and artistic scores emerged as key performance indicators for achieving high total scores and securing a medal in rhythmic gymnastics at the Olympic Games. Coaches should prioritize choreography planning aimed at enhancing difficulty, particularly the apparatus difficulty score, while also focusing on enhancing artistic quality through flawless execution of routines by the gymnasts.
Namen raziskave je bil razčleniti seštevke ocen orodja v rezultatu mnogoboja in določiti ključne kazalnike uspešnosti, po katerih se med 10 finalistkami v ritmiki na olimpijskih igrah 2020 v Tokiu razlikujejo dobitnice odličij od ostalih finalistk. V vzorcu smo ločili dobitnice odličij (n=3) in ostale (n=7). Ocena na vsakem orodju (obroč/žoga/kiji/trak) je imela sedem delov[težavnosti s telesom (DB), težavnosti z orodjem (DA), skupna D ocena, umetniška izvedba (EA), tehnična izvedba (ET), skupna E ocena, skupni rezultat (TS) orodja in skupno končno oceno (TFS-vsota štirih ocen orodij)]. Za izračun razlik so bili uporabljeni Mann–Whitneyjevi testi U in Cohenov izračun velikosti učinka d (ES). Naslednje spremenljivke so bile do |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2232-2639 1855-7171 |
DOI: | 10.52165/sgj.15.3.409-425 |