Variable step‐size estimation over UDP‐based wireless networks with application to a hydrogen‐powered UAV

In this paper, the problem of state estimation for systems over wireless networks using user datagram protocol is focused on. It is known that for such a system, the probability density function of the system state follows a Gaussian mixture model (GMM), and the number of components in this model gr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IET Control Theory and Applications 2024-04, Vol.18 (7), p.865-876
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Shi, Cai, Chenxiao, Xia, Min, Lin, Hong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this paper, the problem of state estimation for systems over wireless networks using user datagram protocol is focused on. It is known that for such a system, the probability density function of the system state follows a Gaussian mixture model (GMM), and the number of components in this model grows exponentially over time, which makes the computation of optimal estimates infeasible. To compute optimal estimates, based on Kullback‐Leibler divergence, a strategy with variable step‐sizes to truncate and fuse the GMM is proposed. Based on the obtained GMM, a variable step‐size estimator is designed to compute optimal estimates during an estimation cycle. The advantages of the proposed estimator are twofold: (1) its estimation performance is superior to that of existing one‐step fast estimators; (2) its estimation efficiency is much higher than that of the optimal estimator. Finally, trajectory tracking has been proposed for a real‐world hydrogen‐powered unmanned aerial vehicle to show the effectiveness of our methods. This paper develops an estimation strategy for systems over wireless networks using user datagram protocol. The advantages of the proposed estimation strategy is twofold: (1) its estimation performance is superior to that of existing one‐step fast estimators; (2) its estimation efficiency is much higher than that of the optimal estimator.
ISSN:1751-8644
1751-8652
DOI:10.1049/cth2.12621