Performance of the BD ProbeTec ET direct detection assay for the analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in respiratory and non-respiratory clinical specimens
Early detection of Mycobacterial tuberculosis infection (MTB) is pivotal for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). This study was performed to evaluate the performance of BD ProbeTec ET direct detection assay (DTB) against the gold standard culture technique for confirmation of MTB infection. A total...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences 2017-08, Vol.12 (4), p.364-368 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Early detection of Mycobacterial tuberculosis infection (MTB) is pivotal for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB).
This study was performed to evaluate the performance of BD ProbeTec ET direct detection assay (DTB) against the gold standard culture technique for confirmation of MTB infection.
A total of 266 consecutive and non-duplicate clinical specimens for detection of MTB were included in this study. There were 118 respiratory and 148 non-respiratory samples. All samples were tested by microscopy for acid-fast bacillus (AFB), MTB culture and biochemical identification with simultaneous testing by DTB.
A total of 88 samples (33%) were culture-positive for MTB including 39/118 respiratory, 29/99 fluid and 20/49 tissue samples. DTB sensitivity for respiratory samples was 97% and specificity was 96% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 93% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. Sensitivity of DTB in fluid samples was 80%, specificity 88%, PPV 69% and NPV 93% whereas sensitivity of DTB for tissue samples was 25%, specificity 90%, PPV 63% and NPV 63%. Of the 50 (56.8%) smear-positive samples, DTB sensitivity was 100% for respiratory, 85% for fluid and 100% for tissue samples.
DTB performed within acceptable limits for the rapid detection of MTB in respiratory samples compared to fluid and tissue specimens. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1658-3612 1658-3612 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.09.005 |