Evaluation of the Elecsys Syphilis electrochemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line screening test in the reverse algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis

•We performed a cross-sectional study to evaluate syphilis serodiagnosis algorithms.•The diagnostic accuracy of reverse algorithm is superior to the traditional algorithm.•The ECDC algorithm has very good agreement with the reverse algorithm.•The ECDC algorithm has diagnostic performance enough for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of infectious diseases 2019-03, Vol.80, p.98-104
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Seungjun, Yu, Hui-Jin, Lim, Sangeun, Park, Hyosoon, Kwon, Min-Jung, Woo, Hee-Yeon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We performed a cross-sectional study to evaluate syphilis serodiagnosis algorithms.•The diagnostic accuracy of reverse algorithm is superior to the traditional algorithm.•The ECDC algorithm has very good agreement with the reverse algorithm.•The ECDC algorithm has diagnostic performance enough for syphilis serodiagnosis. With the development of the automated treponemal test, new syphilis serodiagnosis algorithms, reverse algorithm, and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) algorithm have been recommended recently. We investigated the efficacy of an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) as an initial screening test in the reverse and ECDC algorithms. Samples from 4,771 subjects were included in this study. We performed rapid plasma reagin (RPR), ECLIA, and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) according to these three algorithms. The fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed (FTA-ABS) test was additionally applied for discordant cases between the RPR and ECLIA results. The FTA-ABS results and the consensus of three algorithms were considered a gold standard. A total of 208 subjects were diagnosed with syphilis. The traditional algorithm had a sensitivity of 25.96%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 96.77%. Both the reverse and ECDC algorithms showed the same diagnostic performance, sensitivity of 95.19%, specificity of 99.96%, and accuracy of 99.75%. The agreements between the traditional algorithm and the other algorithms were 96.9% with a kappa value of 0.415. The diagnostic accuracy of the reverse and ECDC algorithms using the ECLIA as a first-line screening test was superior to that of the traditional algorithm.
ISSN:1201-9712
1878-3511
DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2018.12.016