Comparative study of photoplethysmographic waveforms with application of antihypertensive medication in hypertensive patients
Background Multiple studies have been published using a pulse oximeter's photoplethysmographic (PPG) capability to detect tissue perfusion. However, the origin of the PPG signal is still debatable. Aim A comparative study was performed of PPG waveforms in hypertensive patients before and after...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology 2022-05, Vol.27 (3), p.e12941-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Multiple studies have been published using a pulse oximeter's photoplethysmographic (PPG) capability to detect tissue perfusion. However, the origin of the PPG signal is still debatable.
Aim
A comparative study was performed of PPG waveforms in hypertensive patients before and after treatment with antihypertensive medication. The aim of this study was to observe the changes of PPG waveforms before and after lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients and then to detect the relationship between blood pressure and PPG waveforms.
Methods
The PPG waveforms of 60 patients with hypertension were collected. After administration of the antihypertensive medication nitroglycerin, PPG waveforms were collected again. The changes of the T3 (time3): This phase occurred between Marker 3 and Marker 4 (this phase occurs mid‐diastolic) angle, before and after the antihypertensive medication treatment, were compared. The statistical analyses of two related groups were performed using the Paired t‐test.
Results
The blood perfusion waveforms of hypertensive patients before and after antihypertensive medication administration were differently indicated with the tilt angle T3. The slope angle of the T3 phase waveform increased significantly when the blood pressure dropped to normal (−41.9 ± 16.2° vs. −25.6 ± 21.9°, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1082-720X 1542-474X |
DOI: | 10.1111/anec.12941 |