First-line opioid agonist treatment as prevention against assisting others in initiating injection drug use: A longitudinal cohort study of people who inject drugs in Vancouver, Canada
•Most first-time injections involve assistance from people who inject drugs.•Having an untreated opioid use disorder may increase risk of providing assistance.•First-line opioid agonist treatment could therefore reduce assistance provision.•We found evidence to support this presumed protective treat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Drug and alcohol dependence reports 2023-06, Vol.7, p.100168-100168, Article 100168 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Most first-time injections involve assistance from people who inject drugs.•Having an untreated opioid use disorder may increase risk of providing assistance.•First-line opioid agonist treatment could therefore reduce assistance provision.•We found evidence to support this presumed protective treatment effect.•Effect magnitude uncertain due to imprecise estimation and observed heterogeneity.
Among people who inject drugs, frequent injecting and experiencing withdrawal are associated with facilitating others’ first injections. As these factors may reflect an underlying substance use disorder, we investigated whether first-line oral opioid agonist treatment (OAT; methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone) reduces the likelihood that people who inject drugs help others initiate injecting.
We used questionnaire data from semi-annual visits between December 2014–May 2018 on 334 people who inject drugs with frequent non-medical opioid use in Vancouver, Canada. We estimated the effect of current first-line OAT on subsequent injection initiation assistance provision (i.e., helped someone initiate injecting in the following six months) using inverse-probability-weighted estimation of repeated measures marginal structural models to reduce confounding and informative censoring by time-fixed and time-varying covariates.
By follow-up visit, 54–64% of participants reported current first-line OAT whereas 3.4–6.9% provided subsequent injection initiation assistance. Per the primary weighted estimate (n = 1114 person-visits), participants currently on first-line OAT (versus no OAT) were 50% less likely, on average, to subsequently help someone initiate injecting (relative risk [RR]=0.50, 95% CI=0.23–1.11). First-line OAT was associated with reduced risk of subsequent injection initiation assistance provision in participants who, at baseline, injected opioids less than daily (RR=0.15, 95% CI=0.05–0.44) but not in those who injected opioids daily (RR=0.86, 95% CI=0.35–2.11).
First-line OAT seemingly reduces the short-term likelihood that people who inject drugs facilitate first injections. However, the extent of this potential effect remains uncertain due to imprecise estimation and observed heterogeneity by baseline opioid injecting frequency. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2772-7246 2772-7246 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100168 |