Dynamic Classifier Auditing by Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Methods: An Application in Packaging Industry Predictive Maintenance

Predictive maintenance in manufacturing industry applications is a challenging research field. Packaging machines are widely used in a large number of logistic companies’ warehouses and must be working uninterruptedly. Traditionally, preventive maintenance strategies have been carried out to improve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied sciences 2025-01, Vol.15 (2), p.882
Hauptverfasser: Mateo, Fernando, Vila-Francés, Joan, Soria-Olivas, Emilio, Martínez-Sober, Marcelino, Gómez-Sanchis, Juan, Serrano-López, Antonio José
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Predictive maintenance in manufacturing industry applications is a challenging research field. Packaging machines are widely used in a large number of logistic companies’ warehouses and must be working uninterruptedly. Traditionally, preventive maintenance strategies have been carried out to improve the performance of these machines. However, these kinds of policies do not take into account the information provided by the sensors implemented in the machines. This paper presents an expert system for the automatic estimation of work orders to implement predictive maintenance policies for packaging machines. The central innovation lies in a two-stage process: a classifier generates a binary decision on whether a machine requires maintenance, and an unsupervised anomaly detection module subsequently audits the classifier’s probabilistic output to refine and interpret its predictions. By leveraging the classifier to condense sensor data and applying anomaly detection to its output, the system optimizes the decision reliability. Three anomaly detection methods were evaluated: One-Class Support Vector Machine (OCSVM), Minimum Covariance Determinant (MCD), and a majority (hard) voting ensemble of the two. All anomaly detection methods improved the baseline classifier’s performance, with the majority voting ensemble achieving the highest F1 score.
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app15020882