Evidence for selection of multi-resistant E. coli by hospital effluent

•Three assays were used to test if wastewaters select for antibiotic resistance.•Effluents from a Swedish hospital strongly select for multi-resistant E. coli.•Ciprofloxacin and β-lactams were identified as potential selective agents.•Municipal influent selected for β-lactam resistance, but to a sma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environment international 2021-05, Vol.150, p.106436, Article 106436
Hauptverfasser: Kraupner, Nadine, Hutinel, Marion, Schumacher, Kilian, Gray, Declan A., Genheden, Maja, Fick, Jerker, Flach, Carl-Fredrik, Larsson, D.G. Joakim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Three assays were used to test if wastewaters select for antibiotic resistance.•Effluents from a Swedish hospital strongly select for multi-resistant E. coli.•Ciprofloxacin and β-lactams were identified as potential selective agents.•Municipal influent selected for β-lactam resistance, but to a smaller extent.•Municipal effluent did not select for resistance in the applied assays. There is a risk that residues of antibiotics and other antimicrobials in hospital and municipal wastewaters could select for resistant bacteria. Still, direct experimental evidence for selection is lacking. Here, we investigated if effluent from a large Swedish hospital, as well as influent and effluent from the connected municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) select for antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli in three controlled experimental setups. Exposure of sterile-filtered hospital effluent to a planktonic mix of 149 different E. coli wastewater isolates showed a strong selection of multi-resistant strains. Accordingly, exposure to a complex wastewater community selected for strains resistant to several antibiotic classes. Exposing individual strains with variable resistance patterns revealed a rapid bactericidal effect of hospital effluent on susceptible, but not multi-resistant E. coli. No selection was observed after exposure to WWTP effluent, while exposure to WWTP influent indicated a small selective effect for ceftazidime and cefadroxil resistant strains, and only in the E. coli mix assay. An analysis of commonly used antibiotics and non-antibiotic pharmaceuticals in combination with growth and resistance pattern of individual E. coli isolates suggested a possible contribution of ciprofloxacin and β-lactams to the selection by hospital effluent. However, more research is needed to clarify the contribution from different selective agents. While this study does not indicate selection by the studied WWTP effluent, there is some indications of selective effects by municipal influent on β-lactam-resistant strains. Such effects may be more pronounced in countries with higher antibiotic use than Sweden. Despite the limited antibiotic use in Sweden, the hospital effluent strongly and consistently selected for multi-resistance, indicating widespread risks. Hence, there is an urgent need for further evaluation of risks for resistance selection in hospital sewers, as well as for strategies to remove selective agents and resistant bacteria.
ISSN:0160-4120
1873-6750
1873-6750
DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106436