Anemia, leukocytosis and thrombocytosis as prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer treated with radical chemoradiotherapy: A retrospective cohort study

Anemia has long been associated with poor prognosis in patients with cervical cancer. Recently, additional hematologic parameters have emerged as potential indicators of worse outcome in this patient group. In a cohort of cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and brachytherap...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and translational radiation oncology 2017-06, Vol.4 (C), p.51-56
Hauptverfasser: Koulis, Theodora A., Kornaga, Elizabeth N., Banerjee, Robyn, Phan, Tien, Ghatage, Prafull, Magliocco, Anthony M., Lees-Miller, Susan P., Doll, Corinne M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Anemia has long been associated with poor prognosis in patients with cervical cancer. Recently, additional hematologic parameters have emerged as potential indicators of worse outcome in this patient group. In a cohort of cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and brachytherapy, we report on the prognostic significance of hematologic parameters including anemia, leukocytosis, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and thrombocytosis, the effect of combining anemia with other hematologic parameters, and the effect of changes in hemoglobin levels during treatment. Two-hundred fifty-seven cervical cancer patients were retrospectively identified from a single cancer institution’s database. Hematologic parameters were categorized as: anemia (hemoglobin ≤115g/L), leukocytosis (white blood cell count >10×109/L), thrombocytosis (platelets >400×109/L), and NLR (ratio >5). The association between clinical factors and hematologic parameters on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed at 5years. At 5years, both pre-treatment anemia (PFS: 60% vs 34%, p
ISSN:2405-6308
2405-6308
DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2017.05.001