Direct PCR with the CDC 2019 SARS-CoV-2 assay: optimization for limited-resource settings

PCR-based diagnostics generally require nucleic acid extraction from patient specimens prior to amplification. As highlighted early in the COVID-19 pandemic, extraction steps may be difficult to scale during times of massive demand and limited reagent supply. Forgoing an extraction step, we previous...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2022-07, Vol.12 (1), p.11756-11756, Article 11756
Hauptverfasser: Victoriano, Christia M., Pask, Megan E., Malofsky, Nicole A., Seegmiller, Adam, Simmons, Steve, Schmitz, Jonathan E., Haselton, Frederick R., Adams, Nicholas M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:PCR-based diagnostics generally require nucleic acid extraction from patient specimens prior to amplification. As highlighted early in the COVID-19 pandemic, extraction steps may be difficult to scale during times of massive demand and limited reagent supply. Forgoing an extraction step, we previously reported that the N1 primer/probe-set of the widespread CDC COVID-19 assay maintains high categorical sensitivity (95%) and specificity (100%) with direct inoculation of viral transport media (VTM) into qRT-PCR reactions. In contrast, the N2 set demonstrated a prominent C t delay and low sensitivity (33%) without extraction. In the current study, we have improved the performance of this modified CDC assay (in particular the N2 set) by incorporating N1/N2/RNase P multiplexing and dissecting the effects of annealing temperature, VTM interference, and inoculum volume. The latter two factors exerted a more prominent effect on the performance of N2 than N1, although these effects were largely overcome through elevated annealing temperature. This unextracted/multiplex protocol was evaluated with 41 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 43 negative clinical samples, demonstrating a categorical sensitivity of 92.7% and specificity of 100% versus the unmodified CDC methodology. Overall, this work offers a generalizable strategy to maximize testing capabilities for COVID-19 or other emerging pathogens when resources are constrained.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-15356-7