Comprehensive Analyses of the Expression, Genetic Alteration, Prognosis Significance, and Interaction Networks of m6A Regulators Across Human Cancers
Accumulating lines of evidence indicate that the deregulation of m 6 A is involved in various cancer types. The m 6 A RNA methylation is modulated by m 6 A methyltransferases, demethylases, and reader proteins. Although the aberrant expression of m 6 A RNA methylation contributes to the development...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in genetics 2021-12, Vol.12, p.771853-771853 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Accumulating lines of evidence indicate that the deregulation of m
6
A is involved in various cancer types. The m
6
A RNA methylation is modulated by m
6
A methyltransferases, demethylases, and reader proteins. Although the aberrant expression of m
6
A RNA methylation contributes to the development and progression of multiple cancer types, the roles of m
6
A regulators across numerous types of cancers remain largely unknown. Here, we comprehensively investigated the expression, genetic alteration, and prognosis significance of 20 commonly studied m
6
A regulators across diverse cancer types using TCGA datasets
via
bioinformatic analyses. The results revealed that the m
6
A regulators exhibited widespread dysregulation, genetic alteration, and the modulation of oncogenic pathways across TCGA cancer types. In addition, most of the m
6
A regulators were closely relevant with significant prognosis in many cancer types. Furthermore, we also constructed the protein–protein interacting network of the 20 m
6
A regulators, and a more complex interacting regulatory network including m
6
A regulators and their corresponding interacting factors. Besides, the networks between m
6
A regulators and their upstream regulators such as miRNAs or transcriptional factors were further constructed in this study. Finally, the possible chemicals targeting each m
6
A regulator were obtained by bioinformatics analysis and the m
6
A regulators–potential drugs network was further constructed. Taken together, the comprehensive analyses of m
6
A regulators might provide novel insights into the m
6
A regulators’ roles across cancer types and shed light on their potential molecular mechanisms as well as help develop new therapy approaches for cancers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1664-8021 1664-8021 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fgene.2021.771853 |