Comparison of a minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with conventional open surgery for transverse patellar fractures
The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a new minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with those of conventional open surgery for transverse patellar fractures. It was a retrospective study. Adult patients with closed transverse patellar fracture were included, and with open comminu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chinese journal of traumatology 2023-09, Vol.26 (5), p.261-266 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a new minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with those of conventional open surgery for transverse patellar fractures.
It was a retrospective study. Adult patients with closed transverse patellar fracture were included, and with open comminuted patellar fracture were excluded. These patients were divided into minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique (MIOT) group and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) group. Surgical time, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, visual analogue scale score, flexion, extension, Lysholm knee score, infection, malreduction, implant migration and implant irritation in two groups were recorded and compared. Statistical analysis was performed by the SPSS software package (version 19). A p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1008-1275 1008-1275 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.04.005 |