Comparison of a minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with conventional open surgery for transverse patellar fractures

The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a new minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with those of conventional open surgery for transverse patellar fractures. It was a retrospective study. Adult patients with closed transverse patellar fracture were included, and with open comminu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chinese journal of traumatology 2023-09, Vol.26 (5), p.261-266
Hauptverfasser: Yao, Li-Wei, Mao, Hai-Jiao, Dong, Wen-Wei, Wu, Ze-Ting, Liu, Qing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a new minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique with those of conventional open surgery for transverse patellar fractures. It was a retrospective study. Adult patients with closed transverse patellar fracture were included, and with open comminuted patellar fracture were excluded. These patients were divided into minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique (MIOT) group and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) group. Surgical time, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, visual analogue scale score, flexion, extension, Lysholm knee score, infection, malreduction, implant migration and implant irritation in two groups were recorded and compared. Statistical analysis was performed by the SPSS software package (version 19). A p 
ISSN:1008-1275
1008-1275
DOI:10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.04.005