The Nature of Institution Limit in Neighboring Property

There are some of the rules and regulations in our legal system in which their applicaton will lead to delimitation of the private ownership. Public interests and sovereignty enforcement reduces the control of private ownership on one's property and it was shown as absolute and proportional own...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Muṭālaʻāt-i fiqh va ḥuqūq-i Islāmī : dū faṣlnāmah-i ʻilmī, pizhūhishī pizhūhishī, 2015-06, Vol.7 (12), p.185-210
Hauptverfasser: هدی غفاری, محمود زمانی, مسعود رحمانی
Format: Artikel
Sprache:per
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:There are some of the rules and regulations in our legal system in which their applicaton will lead to delimitation of the private ownership. Public interests and sovereignty enforcement reduces the control of private ownership on one's property and it was shown as absolute and proportional ownership. In addition to the possession of lands, some parts of the surrounding areas would be possessed as properties limits, without paying compensation by government and other executive agencies in order to execute public interests plans based on legal justification and, therefore, the property owner would be deprived of legal possession. The nature of these limits, which is against religious juries prudence and civil law, has not been specified yet. The possessions of the owner of limitation by government is not proprietary right and in contrary to those people who believe that it is a kind of easement in other property. It seems that it is ownership delimitation and it does not repudiate the incompatibility between the doctrine of TASLIT and LA ZARAR as well as observing public order and keeping public interests.
ISSN:2008-7012
2717-0330
DOI:10.22075/feqh.2017.1934