Fully automated kidney image biomarker prediction in ultrasound scans using Fast-Unet

Any kidney dimension and volume variation can be a remarkable indicator of kidney disorders. Precise kidney segmentation in standard planes plays an undeniable role in predicting kidney size and volume. On the other hand, ultrasound is the modality of choice in diagnostic procedures. This paper prop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2024-02, Vol.14 (1), p.4782-4782, Article 4782
Hauptverfasser: Oghli, Mostafa Ghelich, Bagheri, Seyed Morteza, Shabanzadeh, Ali, Mehrjardi, Mohammad Zare, Akhavan, Ardavan, Shiri, Isaac, Taghipour, Mostafa, Shabanzadeh, Zahra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Any kidney dimension and volume variation can be a remarkable indicator of kidney disorders. Precise kidney segmentation in standard planes plays an undeniable role in predicting kidney size and volume. On the other hand, ultrasound is the modality of choice in diagnostic procedures. This paper proposes a convolutional neural network with nested layers, namely Fast-Unet++, promoting the Fast and accurate Unet model. First, the model was trained and evaluated for segmenting sagittal and axial images of the kidney. Then, the predicted masks were used to estimate the kidney image biomarkers, including its volume and dimensions (length, width, thickness, and parenchymal thickness). Finally, the proposed model was tested on a publicly available dataset with various shapes and compared with the related networks. Moreover, the network was evaluated using a set of patients who had undergone ultrasound and computed tomography. The dice metric, Jaccard coefficient, and mean absolute distance were used to evaluate the segmentation step. 0.97, 0.94, and 3.23 mm for the sagittal frame, and 0.95, 0.9, and 3.87 mm for the axial frame were achieved. The kidney dimensions and volume were evaluated using accuracy, the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1.
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-55106-5