Detection of Sleep Apnea from Electrocardiogram and Pulse Oximetry Signals Using Random Forest

Sleep apnea (SA) is a common sleep disorder which could impair the human physiological system. Therefore, early diagnosis of SA is of great interest. The traditional method of diagnosing SA is an overnight polysomnography (PSG) evaluation. When PSG has limited availability, automatic SA screening wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied sciences 2022-05, Vol.12 (9), p.4218
Hauptverfasser: Zhu, Jianming, Zhou, Aojie, Gong, Qiong, Zhou, Yu, Huang, Junxiang, Chen, Zhencheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Sleep apnea (SA) is a common sleep disorder which could impair the human physiological system. Therefore, early diagnosis of SA is of great interest. The traditional method of diagnosing SA is an overnight polysomnography (PSG) evaluation. When PSG has limited availability, automatic SA screening with a fewer number of signals should be considered. The primary purpose of this study is to develop and evaluate a SA detection model based on electrocardiogram (ECG) and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2). We adopted a multimodal approach to fuse ECG and SpO2 signals at the feature level. Then, feature selection was conducted using the recursive feature elimination with cross-validation (RFECV) algorithm and random forest (RF) classifier used to discriminate between apnea and normal events. Experiments were conducted on the Apnea-ECG database. The introduced algorithm obtained an accuracy of 97.5%, a sensitivity of 95.9%, a specificity of 98.4% and an AUC of 0.992 in per-segment classification, and outperformed previous works. The results showed that ECG and SpO2 are complementary in detecting SA, and that the combination of ECG and SpO2 enhances the ability to diagnose SA. Therefore, the proposed method has the potential to be an alternative to conventional detection methods.
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app12094218